Search for: All records

Robot-to-human handovers are common exercises in many robotics application domains. The requirements of handovers may vary across these different domains. In this paper, we first devised a taxonomy to organize the diverse and sometimes contradictory requirements. Among these, task-oriented handovers are not well-studied but important because the purpose of the handovers in human-robot collaboration (HRC) is not merely to pass an object from a robot to a human receiver, but to enable the receiver to use it in a subsequent tool-use task. A successful task-oriented handover should incorporate task-related information - orienting the tool such that the human can grasp it in a way that is suitable for the task. We identified multiple difficulty levels of task-oriented handovers, and implemented a system to generate handovers with novel tools on a physical robot. Unlike previous studies on task-oriented handovers, we trained the robot with tool-use demonstrations rather than handover demonstrations, since task-oriented handovers are dependent on the tool usages in the subsequent task. We demonstrated that our method can adapt to all difficulty levels of task-oriented handovers, including tasks that matched the typical usage of the tool, tasks that required an improvised or unusual usage of the tool, and tasks where the handover was adapted to the pose of a manipulandum. 

As personal social robots become more prevalent, the need for the designs of these systems to explicitly consider pets become more apparent. However, it is not known whether dogs would interact with a social robot. In two experiments, we investigate whether dogs respond to a social robot after the robot called their names, and whether dogs follow the ‘sit’ commands given by the robot. We conducted a between-subjects study (n = 34) to compare dogs’ reactions to a social robot with a loudspeaker. Results indicate that dogs gazed at the robot more often after the robot called their names than after the loudspeaker called their names. Dogs followed the ‘sit’ commands more often given by the robot than given by the loudspeaker. The contribution of this study is that it is the first study to provide preliminary evidence that 1) dogs showed positive behaviors to social robots and that 2) social robots could influence dog’s behaviors. This study enhance the understanding of the nature of the social interactions between humans and social robots from the evolutionary approach. Possible explanations for the observed behavior might point toward dogs perceiving robots as agents, the embodiment of the robot creating pressure for socialized responses, or the multimodal (i.e., verbal and visual) cues provided by the robot being more attractive than our control condition.